Can/should happiness be the aim of a moral system?  Compare the arguments of Aristotle, Kant and Mill on this question.  Which thinkers position is most convincing and why?  Pirmary source1. Kant, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals  2. John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism  3. Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics

Grading rubric:
Engagement with/analysis of philosophical texts:  5 points
Substance/structure of philosophical argument:  10 points
Style/grammar/overall form:  5 points


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *