The Case for Reparations
In a 1-2 page response, compare Coates’ Between the World and Me book with his “The Case for Reparations.” What argument does Coates present within each text? How are the two arguments similar? How are they distinct? With regard to how each argument is presented, do you ultimately consider one to be more effective or impactful than the other? If so, why? Be sure to reference specific passages from the texts to support your claims.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *