My professor gave me feedback that my literature review paper was very biased and lacked objectivity.
This is what she said “It is strongly written, although there is a bit of a bias tone to it since there is no dissenting viewpoint provided or alternative.”
“This is a really good start, but still needs some work. Make sure your language shows no bias about the program, but only offers it as a possible solution that you are going to test for intervention to a problem. If you make it sound like this is already proven, there is no need to do any further research. Please see the comments I put on your paper, and let me know if you have questions.”
Without changing the content/citations/essence/formatting of the paper, please re-write the portions that are biased towards Reading Racetrack as an intervention measure to improve sight-word recognition.
