job will be to argue the case 1.(kid getting suspended from school because he debated that weed should be legalized) 2. (Falwell v. hustler) using the existing case law. Based on your knowledge of the law, how would you decide the case and why? Your answers should provide detailed arguments with references to specific cases, precedents, legislation, or concepts if applicable. Cases
ObscenityThe Hicklin Rule (1867), Roth v. US (1957), Comstock Act (1873), Ginzburg vs. US (1966), Mishkin v. New York (1966) Miller v. California (1973), 2Live Crew vs. Broward County (1994)
DefamationNew York Times v. Sullivan (1964), Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts (1967)Rosenbloom v. Metromedia (1971), Gertz v. Welch (1974), McCullen v. Coakley (2014).
TPMDavis v. Massachusetts (1897), Hague v. CIO (1939), Cox v. New Hampshire (1941), Grayned v. Rockford (1972), Perry v. Perry (1983), Krishna v. Lee (1992)
SchoolsTinker v. Des Moines (1969), Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988)
I’ll add other specific questions tomorrow.
