In the attached file, part 1 is what you write for me and part 2 is others comments. Pls write a new post to answer the question in part 2 “Do you think that the role of the judiciary could or should be expanded to take a more active role in challenging parliament in its adherence not only to the written word of the HRA but the interpretation of its purpose?” A new question should be given at the end of post and reference is needed
