In “Just and Unjust War,” Howard Zinn presents a pacifist position against World War II. What do you think are the strongest points he makes that could be generalized beyond World War II to war in general? If you do not think he makes any strong arguments, tell me why you think his argument is weak? Is his position consistent with just war theory discussed in Amstutz, Chapter 7? Explain. Draw upon Zinn’s argument and just war theory to respond to the question, “Does the failure to find weapons of mass destruction invalidate the moral justification for going to war against Iraq?”
