this is my thesis statement: Although humans might benefit from animals being used in product testing, it should be banned because it violates animals rights, and other means of testing product toxicity are available and are more reliable.
there needs to be an informative section, going into the background of animal testing, what it is exactly, and how it is prevalent now.
the first argument:
testing violates animals rights.
second argument:
other means of testing product toxicity are available as well as more reliable.
then a rebuttal:
they help find vaccine, treatments and cures. but its brief, and evidence is used to switch it back to a negative standpoint.
then a conclusion.
